Leolaia,
So has anyone here read Rolf Furuli's new book on chronology,
I was given this book by a 'brother' and started it but then got sidetracked as I'm trying to compile all the secular data myself on 587/586 for this same brother. Hopefully by the time I've done this I'll be in a much better position to review Furuli's book.
From what I've read so far more than half the book has arguments for a 51 year rule for Artaxerxes I, 11 years of which was a co-rule with Xerxes, and therefore his 20th year was 455 BC not 445 BC. His chronological table at the end of the book does not go back beyond 539BC.
The first 90 pages are an attempt to refute the 587/586 dating for Jerusalem's destruction. He spends a long time on Jeremiah 25:11 saying it should be translated "and they will serve these nations together with the King of Babylon seventy years". Maybe a linguist who has read the book may be able to shed more light on this.
I did start to get annoyed with the book as I read it, as it had some typical Watchtower style arguments in it. He dismisses Berossus as unreliable as the early lengths of reign in his king list are thousands of years in length, and his work contained fictitious material. As Berossus translated these legends from books kept at Babylon, and would have used reliable sources such as the Babylonian Chronicles for later neo-Babylonian history, I just can't see the reason to so easily dismiss his record.
The book is also published by 'R. Fufuli A/S'. It would be good to see this work published by an independent publisher and peer reviewed.
CF.